The search for a suspected calling card of the universe’s most elusive matter has come up empty.
Multiple days of telescope time spent looking for a specific X-ray glow coming out of the nearby dwarf galaxy Draco
failed to turn up any signal,
two University of California, Santa Cruz astrophysicists report online
December 7 at arXiv.org. Finding such a glow would have offered a
compelling clue for the identity of dark matter, the invisible, inert
stuff that makes up more than 80 percent of the universe’s matter. The
study’s authors say that the absence of the X-rays in Draco, one of the
most dark matter–dominated objects known, means that scientists had
previously detected the X-ray emissions of interstellar atoms rather
than dark matter.
Not everyone agrees with the study’s conclusion,
including a different team of scientists who commissioned the lengthy
Draco observations and are reviewing the same data. Those scientists,
who haven’t yet published their analysis, say they can’t rule out the
possibility that dark matter produces the X-rays that have been spotted
emanating from other cosmic objects.
Scientists know dark matter
permeates the cosmos because, among other evidence, the outer regions of
galaxies spin faster than they should based on the distribution of the
galaxies’ stars and gas. In an attempt to identify the particles that
make up dark matter, some scientists analyze images of dark matter–rich
regions like galaxy clusters and dwarf galaxies in search of gamma rays,
X-rays or other unexpected signals. Their hope is that dark matter
particles emit observable radiation when they decay or collide with each
other
.
Scientists flagged
one promising signal
in February 2014: bursts of X-rays with an energy of about 3,500
electron volts that consistently appeared in a set of 73 galaxy
clusters. Other groups soon found X-rays streaming from the Perseus
galaxy cluster, Andromeda and the center of the Milky Way, too.
Theorists
quickly pointed out that dark matter in the form of a proposed particle
called a sterile neutrino could decay and emit radiation at that
energy. “It was very exciting,” says Stefano Profumo, an author of the
new paper. “We had a signal that matched with a predicted dark matter
candidate.”
But dark matter isn’t the only way to explain the
X-rays. Profumo and others argued that initial studies underestimated
the role of a kind of decidedly undark matter — potassium atoms — that
can also emit 3,500-eV X-rays in galactic gas clouds. To settle the
issue, a team led by Alexey Boyarsky, a particle physicist at Leiden
University in the Netherlands, pointed the XMM-Newton space telescope at
Draco. The dwarf galaxy, located about 270,000 light-years away,
contains lots of dark matter but barely any potassium-carrying gas.
For
the new study, Profumo and colleague Tesla Jeltema, who are not part of
Boyarsky’s team, analyzed the publicly available XMM-Newton data along
with a previous Draco observation. They found no evidence that the
galaxy radiates 3,500-eV X-rays. Profumo says their results prove that
the X-rays in the other galaxy clusters could not have come from the
decay of dark matter.
Boyarsky agrees that there is no strong
X-ray signal coming from Draco. But he says he’s not convinced that the
data rule out that dark matter decays into X-rays. He expects to share a
more careful analysis encompassing more telescope data within the next
few weeks.
Esra Bulbul, an astrophysicist at the
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics who is working with
Boyarsky, says the new data hurt the case for sterile neutrinos
composing dark matter. But she says that other kinds of dark matter
particles could produce a feebler emission of X-rays that might explain
the Draco observations. “Draco is a good clue, but I’m afraid it’s not
going to be conclusive enough to evaluate the dark matter origin,” she
says. “We have seen the signal in so many clusters.”